A post by Joshua Skaroff

Georgia On My Mind

If you’re not already a regular reader of Nate Silver’s election analysis over at FiveThirtyEight.com then you’re truly missing out. Silver is best known for creating the modern baseball statistic of PECOTA, a system for forecasting future player performance. This year he’s turned his talent towards electoral forecasting and today he’s got some analysis of the state of play in Georgia. He believes that Obama is already ahead in Georgia based on early voting.

Perhaps the only happy consequence of the segregation era is that a number of Southern states like Georgia are required by the Voting Rights Act to keep statistics on registration and turnout by the race of the voter. Those statistics suggest that black voter registration is up materially from 2004.

Here are the numbers. In November 2004, black voters represented 27.4 percent of Georgia’s active registered voter pool. As of October 1st, that figure has increased to 29.0 percent.

So suppose that by tonight, black voters have increased to 30 percent of Georgia’s registered voter pool. Plugging that 30 percent number in, McCain’s advantage is a mere 1 point.

Think these numbers sound unreasonable? Early voting is underway in Georgia, and according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, black voters do not represent 30 percent of Georgia’s early voter turnout. Instead, they represent almost 40 percent. Although early voting figures can be idiosyncratic, Barack Obama certainly seems to be having little trouble getting his vote out. Indeed, Barack Obama is winning Georgia right now.

A post by Peter Slutsky

Electoral College Roulette

The Chicago Tribune reports (from Political Wire)

“A coalition of former congressmen is launching a campaign to change how Americans select their president by reforming the Electoral College system, saying campaigns for the White House should be reliant on the nationwide popular vote rather than simply the outcome in a handful of swing states,” the Chicago Tribune reports.

“The bipartisan group plans to announce its proposal Thursday and begin a state-by-state effort to amend the Electoral College so the winner reflects the view of the country instead of an individual state or two with a close vote on Election Day. The plan would seek to eliminate the possibility of a candidate winning the popular vote but losing the election, as happened to former Vice President Al Gore in 2000.”

Says former Sen. Birch Bayh (D-IN): “The time is long past to not play Electoral College roulette every four years. It is a throwback to 1887.”

The Electoral College is certainly an issue that is open for debate. In fact, we would love to have that debate on DoubleSpeak, so please leave a comment below.

Right after the 2000, election, Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and some others talked about the need to do away with Electoral College, but, like most things in U.S. politics, the reforms never made it out of the gate.