<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So You Wanna Burn the Flag?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doublespeakshow.com/2006/06/28/so-you-wanna-burn-the-flag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doublespeakshow.com/2006/06/28/so-you-wanna-burn-the-flag/</link>
	<description>at the intersection of radio, blogs, and grassroots politics...you'll find DoubleSpeak.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Names &#171; Quieted Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.doublespeakshow.com/2006/06/28/so-you-wanna-burn-the-flag/#comment-97806</link>
		<dc:creator>Names &#171; Quieted Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublespeakshow.com/2006/06/28/so-you-wanna-burn-the-flag/#comment-97806</guid>
		<description>[...] Photo credit: Double Speak [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photo credit: Double Speak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urthwalker</title>
		<link>http://www.doublespeakshow.com/2006/06/28/so-you-wanna-burn-the-flag/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>urthwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublespeakshow.com/2006/06/28/so-you-wanna-burn-the-flag/#comment-815</guid>
		<description>According to wiki:
The basic design of the flag is specified by sections 1 and 2 of Title 4, United States Code (4 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (2004)). Executive Order 10834 which may be found as a note to section 1, specifies the proportions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union. [1]. The specification gives the following values:

    * Hoist (width) of flag: A = 1.0
    * Fly (length) of flag: B = 1.9
    * Hoist (width) of Union: C = 0.5385 (7/13, spanning seven stripes)
    * Fly (length) of Union: D = 0.76 (1.9 × 2/5, two fifths of the flag length)
    * E = F = 0.0538 (C/10, One tenth the width of the Union)
    * G = H = 0.0633 (D/12, One twelfth the length of the Union)
    * Diameter of star: K = 0.0616
    * Width of stripe: L = 0.0769 (1/13)

So how would they enforce this law?  If I burn a tapestry that has only 49 stars, is that still a flag?  What if it only has 12 stripes?  What if it's square?  Are they going to try and legislate intent (as in, he meant it was a flag even though it wasn't)?  This is the kind of argument the right trots out in order to avoid implementing hate crime bills, so what's it gonna be?

What a spectacular waste of time.

&lt;a href="http://www.thehindsightfactor.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Hindsight Factor&lt;/a&gt;
 )(* )(*)(* )( *) * )( *)( *)( * )(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to wiki:<br />
The basic design of the flag is specified by sections 1 and 2 of Title 4, United States Code (4 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (2004)). Executive Order 10834 which may be found as a note to section 1, specifies the proportions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union. [1]. The specification gives the following values:</p>
<p>    * Hoist (width) of flag: A = 1.0<br />
    * Fly (length) of flag: B = 1.9<br />
    * Hoist (width) of Union: C = 0.5385 (7/13, spanning seven stripes)<br />
    * Fly (length) of Union: D = 0.76 (1.9 × 2/5, two fifths of the flag length)<br />
    * E = F = 0.0538 (C/10, One tenth the width of the Union)<br />
    * G = H = 0.0633 (D/12, One twelfth the length of the Union)<br />
    * Diameter of star: K = 0.0616<br />
    * Width of stripe: L = 0.0769 (1/13)</p>
<p>So how would they enforce this law?  If I burn a tapestry that has only 49 stars, is that still a flag?  What if it only has 12 stripes?  What if it&#8217;s square?  Are they going to try and legislate intent (as in, he meant it was a flag even though it wasn&#8217;t)?  This is the kind of argument the right trots out in order to avoid implementing hate crime bills, so what&#8217;s it gonna be?</p>
<p>What a spectacular waste of time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thehindsightfactor.com" rel="nofollow">The Hindsight Factor</a><br />
 )(* )(*)(* )( *) * )( *)( *)( * )(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.doublespeakshow.com/2006/06/28/so-you-wanna-burn-the-flag/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublespeakshow.com/2006/06/28/so-you-wanna-burn-the-flag/#comment-807</guid>
		<description>Don't forget this:

&lt;img src="http://americablog.blogspot.com/bushsignsflag2003" /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget this:</p>
<p><img src="http://americablog.blogspot.com/bushsignsflag2003" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
