Katherine Harris has gone mad. Really, she has. First, she went on Fox News’ Hannity and that other dude and declared (awkwardly to camera) that she will stay in the race for U.S. Senate in Florida. She promised that she would spend her recent inheritance to fund her campaign.

And why would she want to spend millions of dollars to run for U.S Senate? That’s simple, God wants her to get elected. Now that’s an endorsement!

Harris, who told a national television audience Wednesday that she would be spending $10 million to win Florida’s U.S. Senate race, said she never would have entered politics if she did not believe that God wanted her to make public service part of her life.

Wait for it…wait for it…OK, go…

FLIP-FLOP. Now Harris says she actually won’t be spending her inheritance but will rely instead on money she already has in the bank.

In an effort to jump-start her sputtering Senate campaign, Rep. Katherine Harris went on national television invoking the memory of her late father and saying the money he left her will form the financial foundation of her challenge to Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson.

Now the Harris campaign says that’s not the case.

Campaign spokeswoman Morgan Dobbs said Thursday that Harris will sell her existing assets rather than rely on money from her father, a bank executive who died in January.

“It is my understanding from her statements that she does not plan to use inherited money on the campaign — rather, money from liquidating her personal assets, which she says total $10 million,” Dobbs wrote in an e-mail to the Orlando Sentinel.

“I think I am being pretty clear.”

Yes Katherine, you’re being extremely clear. I hope God doesn’t get cold feet on the aforementioned endorsement.

Since Jeanine Pirro lost the US Senate race to Hillary Clinton a good nine months before election day, her replacement, KT McFarland, is trying a different strategy. She’s been touting her national security credentials–specifically, that she wrote President Reagan’s 1983 Star Wars speech and was once the highest ranking woman in the Defense Department. The only problem, according to the New York Times, is neither claim is true.

But, it gets better…

Ms. McFarland’s biography has already emerged as an issue in the Republican primary. Her rival, John Spencer, a former mayor of Yonkers, has asserted that she inflated her position by claiming that she held the equivalent civilian rank of a three-star general while in the Pentagon. Ms. McFarland’s campaign said that she had claimed only to be the civilian equivalent of “a two-and-a-half-star general.”

Impressive, if there was such a thing. Those NY Republicans really know how to pick a winner.